Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Write tests for Boolean class #328

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

yjaeseok
Copy link
Contributor

@yjaeseok yjaeseok commented Sep 6, 2018

The new tests cover a part of the basic type conversion from JavaScript
type to native type.

The new tests cover a part of the basic type conversion from JavaScript
type to native type.
Copy link
Contributor

@romandev romandev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

non-owner lgtm

test(require(`../build/${buildType}/binding_noexcept.node`));

function test(binding) {

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Unnecessary blank line.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, okay I will remove it.
Thank you for review

Copy link
Member

@NickNaso NickNaso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

mhdawson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2018
The new tests cover a part of the basic type conversion from JavaScript
type to native type.

PR-URL: #328
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Nicola Del Gobbo <nicoladelgobbo@NickNaso.local>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

landed as 14c69ab. @yjaeseok thank you for helping to improve the test coverage.

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this Sep 18, 2018
kevindavies8 added a commit to kevindavies8/node-addon-api-Develop that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2022
The new tests cover a part of the basic type conversion from JavaScript
type to native type.

PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#328
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Nicola Del Gobbo <nicoladelgobbo@NickNaso.local>
Marlyfleitas added a commit to Marlyfleitas/node-api-addon-Development that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
The new tests cover a part of the basic type conversion from JavaScript
type to native type.

PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#328
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Nicola Del Gobbo <nicoladelgobbo@NickNaso.local>
wroy7860 added a commit to wroy7860/addon-api-benchmark-node that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2022
The new tests cover a part of the basic type conversion from JavaScript
type to native type.

PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#328
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Nicola Del Gobbo <nicoladelgobbo@NickNaso.local>
austinli64 added a commit to austinli64/node-addon-api that referenced this pull request May 9, 2023
The new tests cover a part of the basic type conversion from JavaScript
type to native type.

PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#328
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Nicola Del Gobbo <nicoladelgobbo@NickNaso.local>
johnfrench3 pushed a commit to johnfrench3/node-addon-api-git that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2023
The new tests cover a part of the basic type conversion from JavaScript
type to native type.

PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#328
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Nicola Del Gobbo <nicoladelgobbo@NickNaso.local>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants