Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

tools: fix inspector-check reporting #16902

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

tools: fix inspector-check reporting #16902

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
cefa06d
tools: fix inspector-check reporting
danbev Oct 23, 2017
8ad431a
squash: remove missingCheckNodes check in report
danbev Nov 10, 2017
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 6 additions & 4 deletions tools/eslint-rules/inspector-check.js
View file
Open in desktop
Expand Up @@ -14,12 +14,12 @@ const msg = 'Please add a skipIfInspectorDisabled() call to allow this ' +
'test to be skippped when Node is built \'--without-inspector\'.';

module.exports = function(context) {
var usesInspector = false;
const missingCheckNodes = [];
var hasInspectorCheck = false;

function testInspectorUsage(context, node) {
if (utils.isRequired(node, ['inspector'])) {
usesInspector = true;
missingCheckNodes.push(node);
}
}

Expand All @@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ module.exports = function(context) {
}

function reportIfMissing(context, node) {
if (usesInspector && !hasInspectorCheck) {
context.report(node, msg);
if (missingCheckNodes.length > 0 && !hasInspectorCheck) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You don't have to check missingCheckNodes.length > 0, just the !hasInspectorCheck is enough.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right, I'll fix that. Thanks

missingCheckNodes.forEach((node) => {
context.report(node, msg);
});
}
}

Expand Down