vm: rename vm.Module to vm.SourceTextModule #22007
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
build
|
Is it in preparation for adding other kinds of modules? |
|
@targos mostly... even if the spec doesn't define any more types we should still name them correctly. |
cjihrig
added
the
semver-major
cjihrig
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2018
|
It doesn't have to be semver major. The API is experimental and behind a flag |
TimothyGu
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2018
TimothyGu
removed
the
semver-major
|
Not that you have to, but can you explain this? What kind of ES modules would not have some kind of source text associated with them? If this is to distinguish from e.g. WASM modules or so, maybe referring to the used language might be better? (Also, fyi: @nodejs/modules) |
|
@addaleax At the last TC39 meeting, a new type of Module Records backed by JavaScript source called Dynamic Module Records was discussed, and it is now at Stage 1. Regardless of whether that proposal makes it all the way into the spec, |
ljharb
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2018
benjamingr
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2018
jkrems
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2018
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2018
|
@devsnek Would also be nice if my last comment (#22007 (comment)) is integrated into the commit message body. |
|
@TimothyGu will do when I land 👍 |
targos
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2018
hiroppy
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2018
jasnell
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2018
jdalton
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2018
bmeck
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2018
At the last TC39 meeting, a new type of Module Records backed by JavaScript source called Dynamic Module Records was discussed, and it is now at Stage 1. Regardless of whether that proposal makes it all the way into the spec, SourceTextModule is indeed a more descriptive and accurate name for what this class represents. PR-URL: nodejs#22007 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jan Krems <jan.krems@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
devsnek
force-pushed
the
rename-vm-module
branch
from
62adcd3
to
2bdcdfc
Compare
|
landed in 2bdcdfc |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2018
At the last TC39 meeting, a new type of Module Records backed by JavaScript source called Dynamic Module Records was discussed, and it is now at Stage 1. Regardless of whether that proposal makes it all the way into the spec, SourceTextModule is indeed a more descriptive and accurate name for what this class represents. PR-URL: #22007 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jan Krems <jan.krems@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Merged
This was referenced Aug 1, 2018
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Should have always been named SourceTextModule
/cc @nodejs/vm
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes