Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

worker: display MessagePort status in util.inspect() #22658

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

addaleax
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax commented Sep 2, 2018

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@addaleax addaleax added the worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support. label Sep 2, 2018
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support. label Sep 2, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

addaleax commented Sep 2, 2018

@nodejs/workers

Copy link
Member

@benjamingr benjamingr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

addaleax commented Sep 2, 2018

Fixed linter nits.

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/16956/

@addaleax addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Sep 2, 2018
Copy link
Member

@lundibundi lundibundi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a few nits.


function tick(n, cb) {
if (--n > 0)
return setImmediate(() => tick(n - 1, cb));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is return needed here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, removed it :)

});
port1.postMessage(2);

function tick(n, cb) {
if (--n > 0)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This actually makes half-the-n ticks, was this intentional?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope. Thanks for catching!

} : {
active: true,
refed: ref
}, this);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: could you please put this on a separate line as it's kind of confusing?
Also, I'd suggest extracting second argument creation to a separate variable to make it easier to understand =). Though I'm fine with this too.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done (moving to a separate line)

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

addaleax commented Sep 2, 2018

Resume CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/16975/ (:heavy_check_mark:)

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

addaleax commented Sep 5, 2018

Landed in caf8e7a, b3eb3a1

@addaleax addaleax closed this Sep 5, 2018
@addaleax addaleax deleted the message-port-inspect branch September 5, 2018 10:31
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2018
PR-URL: #22658
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2018
Look at the status of the `MessagePort` rather than
relying on a timeout.

PR-URL: #22658
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2018
PR-URL: #22658
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2018
Look at the status of the `MessagePort` rather than
relying on a timeout.

PR-URL: #22658
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2018
PR-URL: #22658
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2018
Look at the status of the `MessagePort` rather than
relying on a timeout.

PR-URL: #22658
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants