Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v10.x] Backport util PRs #23039

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

targos
Copy link
Member

@targos targos commented Sep 23, 2018

Backport of #22503, #22787, #20857, #22788 and #22992.
Closes #22872

BridgeAR and others added 7 commits September 23, 2018 18:49
PR-URL: nodejs#22503
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
This significantly reduces the benchmark runtime. It removes to many
variations that do not provide any benefit and reduces the iterations.

PR-URL: nodejs#22503
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
This significantly improves the inspection performance for all array
types. From now on only the visible elements cause work instead of
having to process all array keys no matter how many entries are
visible.

This also moves some code out of the main function to reduce the
overall function complexity.

PR-URL: nodejs#22503
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
The inspection indentation level was not always reset to it's former
value in case the maximum call stack size was exceeded.

PR-URL: nodejs#22787
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Define `util.inspect.custom` as
`Symbol.for("nodejs.util.inspect.custom")` rather than
`Symbol("util.inspect.custom")`. This allows `inspect` hooks to
easily/safely be defined in non-Node.js environments.

Fixes: nodejs#20821
Refs: nodejs#22684

PR-URL: nodejs#20857
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
The order option can be used to sort the inspected values in case
they do not rely on their order as arrays. That way the output is
stable no matter of the object property inspection order.

PR-URL: nodejs#22788
Refs: nodejs#22763
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
In V8 7.0, the array sorting algorithm was changed to Timsort, which
is stable. A compare function returning only `true` or `false`
(converted to 0 and 1) cannot work properly.

PR-URL: nodejs#22992
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Kyle Farnung <kfarnung@microsoft.com>
@targos targos added util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module. v10.x labels Sep 23, 2018
@targos targos added this to Open PRs in v10.x via automation Sep 23, 2018
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module. v10.x labels Sep 23, 2018
@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Sep 23, 2018

Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks a lot for backporting these!

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

I am going to backport #22845 when this landed.

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
Backport-PR-URL: #23039
PR-URL: #22503
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
This significantly reduces the benchmark runtime. It removes to many
variations that do not provide any benefit and reduces the iterations.

Backport-PR-URL: #23039
PR-URL: #22503
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
This significantly improves the inspection performance for all array
types. From now on only the visible elements cause work instead of
having to process all array keys no matter how many entries are
visible.

This also moves some code out of the main function to reduce the
overall function complexity.

Backport-PR-URL: #23039
PR-URL: #22503
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
The inspection indentation level was not always reset to it's former
value in case the maximum call stack size was exceeded.

Backport-PR-URL: #23039
PR-URL: #22787
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
Define `util.inspect.custom` as
`Symbol.for("nodejs.util.inspect.custom")` rather than
`Symbol("util.inspect.custom")`. This allows `inspect` hooks to
easily/safely be defined in non-Node.js environments.

Fixes: #20821
Refs: #22684

Backport-PR-URL: #23039
PR-URL: #20857
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
The order option can be used to sort the inspected values in case
they do not rely on their order as arrays. That way the output is
stable no matter of the object property inspection order.

Backport-PR-URL: #23039
PR-URL: #22788
Refs: #22763
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
In V8 7.0, the array sorting algorithm was changed to Timsort, which
is stable. A compare function returning only `true` or `false`
(converted to 0 and 1) cannot work properly.

Backport-PR-URL: #23039
PR-URL: #22992
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Kyle Farnung <kfarnung@microsoft.com>
@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Sep 24, 2018

Landed in e16dd6d...b48dc0b

@targos targos closed this Sep 24, 2018
v10.x automation moved this from Open PRs to Closed PRs Sep 24, 2018
@targos targos deleted the v10-util-backports branch September 24, 2018 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module.
Projects
No open projects
v10.x
  
Closed PRs
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants