Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add option to require 'process' to api docs #26792

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dkundel
Copy link
Contributor

@dkundel dkundel commented Mar 20, 2019

It is possible to require the 'process' module and with the upcoming
support for ES Modules, importing 'process' might be the more favorable
way for developers. This commit adds that option to the documentation as suggested by @MylesBorins.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

It is possible to require the 'process' module and with the upcoming
support for ES Modules, importing 'process' might be the more favorable
way for developers. This commit adds that option to the documentation.
Remove unnecessary word from API documentation.
Adjust paragraph to 80 character wrap limit
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. labels Mar 20, 2019
Copy link
Member

@MylesBorins MylesBorins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 25, 2019
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Mar 26, 2019

Landed in 136c805.

@danbev danbev closed this Mar 26, 2019
danbev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
It is possible to require the 'process' module and with the upcoming
support for ES Modules, importing 'process' might be the more favorable
way for developers. This commit adds that option to the documentation.

PR-URL: #26792
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
It is possible to require the 'process' module and with the upcoming
support for ES Modules, importing 'process' might be the more favorable
way for developers. This commit adds that option to the documentation.

PR-URL: #26792
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2019
It is possible to require the 'process' module and with the upcoming
support for ES Modules, importing 'process' might be the more favorable
way for developers. This commit adds that option to the documentation.

PR-URL: nodejs#26792
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2019
It is possible to require the 'process' module and with the upcoming
support for ES Modules, importing 'process' might be the more favorable
way for developers. This commit adds that option to the documentation.

PR-URL: #26792
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants