Upgrade V8 to 4.7 into the new vee-eight-4.7 branch #3481
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ofrobots
force-pushed
the
vee-eight-4.7
branch
from
de76852
to
10375c5
Compare
|
you are targeting master |
|
@targos Yeah, I didn't set the target branch at the time of creating the pull request, now it can't be edited unless I close the PR and create a new one 😢. The intent is to push to |
|
Tests on |
|
@joaocgreis not sure why we're getting a timeout on those machines but for the original armv6 jobs I had to tweak the jenkins git timeout parameter to make it consistently happier. There's an advanced git option in jenkins job setup that lets you set this, maybe it should be done for the fanned jobs? |
|
@rvagg increased the timeouts to 30, no harm in that. Note that this failure happened on the master, before the jobs connect to the machines. There are frequent problems connecting to the windows machines, but that's a different thing. |
ofrobots
force-pushed
the
vee-eight-4.7
branch
from
10375c5
to
3067572
Compare
|
Updated to V8 4.7.80.15, rebased to latest master, removed the *.orig files from the cherry-pick (sorry), and launched a new CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/566/. |
|
Looks like one of the freebsd boxes has a hung process. https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-freebsd/82/nodes=freebsd101-32/ /cc @nodejs/build |
|
Relaunched CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/584 |
|
(fyi i killed all trailing processes yesterday) |
|
LGTM |
ofrobots
force-pushed
the
vee-eight-4.7
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fc5d47d
to
b33ee46
Compare
Pick up the latest branch head for V8 4.7: v8/v8@b9b1048 Full change history for the 4.7 branch: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git/+log/branch-heads/4.7 V8 blog post about what is new on V8 4.7: http://v8project.blogspot.de/2015/10/v8-release-47.html PR-URL: nodejs#3481 Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Array#includes is now available. PR-URL: nodejs#3481 Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Backport 1ee712ab8687e5f4dec93d45da068d37d28feb8b from V8 upstream.
Original commit message:
Add SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#31111}
Ref: nodejs#3036
PR-URL: nodejs#3481
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
|
Landed on |
ofrobots
force-pushed
the
vee-eight-4.7
branch
from
b33ee46
to
3d2f2f0
Compare
|
Can this be closed then @ofrobots ? |
|
Closing the issue. Ping @indutny: please open a new issue if this doesn't completely contain your |
ofrobots
added a commit
to ofrobots/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2015
Array#includes is now available. PR-URL: nodejs#3481 Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
ofrobots
pushed a commit
to ofrobots/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2015
Backport 1ee712ab8687e5f4dec93d45da068d37d28feb8b from V8 upstream.
Original commit message:
Add SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#31111}
Ref: nodejs#3036
PR-URL: nodejs#3481
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
ofrobots
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2015
Array#includes is now available. PR-URL: #3481 Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
misterdjules
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2015
Backport 1ee712ab8687e5f4dec93d45da068d37d28feb8b from V8 upstream.
Original commit message:
Add SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31111}
Ref: #3036
PR-URL: #3481
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
ofrobots
added a commit
to ofrobots/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2015
Array#includes is now available. PR-URL: nodejs#3481 Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
ofrobots
pushed a commit
to ofrobots/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2015
Backport 1ee712ab8687e5f4dec93d45da068d37d28feb8b from V8 upstream.
Original commit message:
Add SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#31111}
Ref: nodejs#3036
PR-URL: nodejs#3481
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
ofrobots
added a commit
to ofrobots/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2015
Array#includes is now available. Ref: nodejs#3481 PR-URL: nodejs#4106 Reviewed-By: bnoordhuis - Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: rvagg - Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
ofrobots
pushed a commit
to ofrobots/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2015
Backport 1ee712ab8687e5f4dec93d45da068d37d28feb8b from V8 upstream.
Original commit message:
Add SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#31111}
Ref: nodejs#3036
Ref: nodejs#3481
PR-URL: nodejs#4106
Reviewed-By: bnoordhuis - Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: rvagg - Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
misterdjules
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2015
Backport 1ee712ab8687e5f4dec93d45da068d37d28feb8b from V8 upstream.
Original commit message:
Add SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31111}
Ref: #3036
Ref: #3481
PR-URL: #4106
Reviewed-By: bnoordhuis - Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: rvagg - Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
scovetta
pushed a commit
to scovetta/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2016
Array#includes is now available. Ref: nodejs#3481 PR-URL: nodejs#4106 Reviewed-By: bnoordhuis - Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: rvagg - Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
scovetta
pushed a commit
to scovetta/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2016
Backport 1ee712ab8687e5f4dec93d45da068d37d28feb8b from V8 upstream.
Original commit message:
Add SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#31111}
Ref: nodejs#3036
Ref: nodejs#3481
PR-URL: nodejs#4106
Reviewed-By: bnoordhuis - Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: targos - Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: rvagg - Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is for
vee-eight-4.7. Do not land onmaster.This brings in V8 4.7.80.
915, along with a back-port of v8/v8@1ee712a which upstream is unable to back-port to 4.7.@indutny I believe that 1fdec65 and 972a0c8 no longer need to be floated as on master. The V8 4.7 import picks up your
array_buffer_trackerchanges. Please confirm.R=@indutny, @nodejs/v8