src: remove duplicated code in GenerateSingleExecutableBlob()
#49119
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Review requested:
|
nodejs-github-bot
added
needs-ci
lpinca
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2023
deokjinkim
reviewed
Aug 12, 2023
src/node_sea.cc
Outdated
Comment on lines
499
to
504
| std::optional<std::string> optional_code_cache = | ||
| GenerateCodeCache(config.main_path, main_script); | ||
| if (!optional_code_cache.has_value()) { | ||
| FPrintF(stderr, "Cannot generate V8 code cache\n"); | ||
| return ExitCode::kGenericUserError; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IMO, these lines(499-504) are only needed if flag for code cache is enabled. So how about removing above declaration(489-494) instead of this? Plus, declaration of code_cache variable(497) can be moved into if statement.
@RaisinTen PTAL when you are available.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@deokjinkim
Thank you for your good comments.
You are right. It seems like a better idea. I reflected what you said.
pluris
force-pushed
the
fix/remove_unnessary_code
branch
from
4026cf4
to
0f27c01
Compare
deokjinkim
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2023
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
tony-go
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2023
RaisinTen
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2023
RaisinTen
added
author ready
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
|
Landed in 6476c99 |
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2023
PR-URL: #49119 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Deokjin Kim <deokjin81.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Merged
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
to RafaelGSS/node
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#49119 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Deokjin Kim <deokjin81.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
rluvaton
pushed a commit
to rluvaton/node
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#49119 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Deokjin Kim <deokjin81.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2023
PR-URL: #49119 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Deokjin Kim <deokjin81.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
PR-URL: #49119 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Deokjin Kim <deokjin81.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The removed
optional_code_cachevariable is already declared with the same name in the line below.In my opinion, it was judged to be unnecessary redundant code and was removed.
node/src/node_sea.cc
Lines 489 to 494 in 3224527