Limit concurrent build in travis

[mcollina]

I think this repository would benefit a limit to the concurrent builds in Travis to 1. This might help reducing the localtunnel failures:

https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build#Limiting-Concurrent-Builds

cc @calvinmetcalf @addaleax @williamkapke

[calvinmetcalf]

ok that sounds sensible

…

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:09 AM Matteo Collina ***@***.***> wrote: I think this repository would benefit a limit to the concurrent builds in Travis to 1. This might help reducing the localtunnel failures: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build#Limiting-Concurrent-Builds cc @calvinmetcalf <https://github.com/calvinmetcalf> @addaleax <https://github.com/addaleax> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#265>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABE4n3DYlqFBUCFv2cLaQIVDd3IIlSrUks5rl5y0gaJpZM4MdnFU> .

[calvinmetcalf]

@Fishrock123 you've done this for us in the past

[Fishrock123]

I can do it but I will probably get quite a bit of heat for doing so again if it still requests private access. I have reached out to travis to confirm whether their split perms now properly apply for organizations or not.

[mcollina]

@Fishrock123 what will be the best approach if not? We move readable-stream to core CI infrastructure?

[Fishrock123]

Probably move either the private stuff or this stuff to a new org as has been discussed before. What a mess.

[Fishrock123]

Unless you really want to build for and consume core ci resources...

[mcollina]

I'm 👍 in moving to our own org, if it's not a problem for the rest of the collaborators. It might make GitHub teams more fuzzy though.

[addaleax]

Are we talking about moving readable-stream out of the nodejs github org? I am not sure I feel very positive about that. It should definitely be visible that the work here ultimately happens under the Foundation/TSC…

Other projects like node-inspect or citgm (as a project on its own) also use the Core CI infra, so there’s certainly precedent for that.

[calvinmetcalf]

yeah I'm with @addaleax I'd prefer to only do that as a last resort

[Fishrock123]

Going to email travis support. Hopefully we'll hear back.

[mcollina]

@Fishrock123 did you hear anything back? I think we might just have to move to the foundation CI system.

[mcollina]

This is not possible, we are moving to the Foundation CI.