-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Money, money, money ... aka. Bountysource #369
Comments
What's the money for? Would be great to pay someone ("paid intern") evaluate/update existing nodeschool lessons but that's pretty tedious and skilled work . . . What's the thing you're interested in spending money on in the project, and who do you see it coming from? Personally I'd go for the "corporate sponsorship of a lesson"/adopt-a-lesson model-- exchange logo rights for SLA saying that company will respond to questions & fix bugs within 30 days. |
I think this could work, but needs to be done very transparently with clear intentions. |
My immediate thought was this could perhaps be used to get major issues with workshoppers taken care of, as @Sequoia alluded to, as many workshoppers are showing their age and general neglect. Anything involving money, though, can be potentially very tricky. I'd be very careful involving the entire org with money matters. Has there been a need for a monthly newsletter? I must've missed the convo. What would the content of the newsletter entail? |
I'm guilty. Money isn't really the issue though, the issue is more motivating volunteers to invest time into the workshoppers. |
I can think of various things: i.e.
In short: I think it should be used to:
The money that moves on BountySource is as transparent as I can imagine things. After a
Bountysource has a new feature called
I do not know how many people signed up for the Newsletter but last I checked the number was in the 1000s. Things I imagine people would love to know:
The conversation about newsletters happened in the newsletter repo.
Thats true, it is not. But we do have several issue that could maybe be solved with money, so: I wonder: why not? For example: I would love if some of the translation could be automated for example. Because: while translation has been an awesome boost but Its existence is a speed-limit to improvements. Gengo (a paid service) could make it smoother. Another thought is there are some things that organizers fight with, and if they invest their time I think it would be good to have the possibility for a reward. (@timoxley: #370)
I do not have an issue with that model but I think it should not be part of the organization to offer that: Writing a workshopper is hard work and There have been other issues about money: |
Due to lack of support I close this issue. |
@martinheidegger just read this https://medium.com/@leichtgewicht/the-missing-hands-at-nodeschool-8999a90d33d1#.41kimln49 I thought it might be worth mentioning open collective: https://opencollective.com/ which could suit for this.. I know I'd happily contribute to a nodeschool open collective, I wonder would others too... :) I think similar orgs use it for funding this type of organisation: https://opencollective.com/railsgirlsatl. I help out with the Dublin chapter when I can, and really enjoy the events. Just wanted to say seriously great work to you and all others who've contributed to nodeschool 🎉 |
@johnbrett Thank you for letting us know about opencollective. It certainly is an interesting project. However, I think bountysource's salt would works much like opencollective but is seems slightly better connected to the github structure and less dependent on paying out money directly (getting money from either services is charged at 10%). If we were to go down the money road bountysource seems a better bet. (Note: Received a donation from @pcuci, not sure what to do with it ...) |
@martinheidegger I thought this was a good idea. We'll charge $5 at the next event for refreshments, the remaining cash can go to bountysource. |
Hey @pcuci, what deliverables would you like to attach to see from this ticket/discussion? This particular ticket was closed a month ago due to lack of interest/support. |
Open to suggestions @Sequoia I'm planning a mini-fund-raising experiment on our next NodeSchool event, see what the difference from ticket prices is to go towards bountysource support(?) It may very well be zero, in which case we mark this off as something we tried and learned from, dunno. |
@pcuci You have not accepted the invite yet: |
My suggestion is that we return this ticket to the "closed" state. 😸 We discussed this a bit ago, it came to naught. Passing the hat at your own event does not require whole-group discussion-- you're free to do so and do what you wish with the money! 💸 Please specify exactly what you want to see from this ticket if you wish to reopen it. Better yet, open a new ticket with a specific proposal. Gitter is great for discussion if you just want to kick ideas around. |
Hello @nodeschool/core !
I have just maintained the admin rights to https://www.bountysource.com/teams/nodeschool Which is a team at Bountysource that allows crowdfunding for open source. I thought it might be neat to have that option. It is a donation based system for all our efforts. For this I wondered following:
core
members please)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: