Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update seneca-redis-store to version 1.0.0 πŸš€ #78

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2016

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello πŸ‘‹

πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€

seneca-redis-store just published its new version 1.0.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of seneca-redis-store – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


GitHub Release

Replaced object mapping code with a serializer.
Enhanced string connections.
Update dependencies. Newer Redis client.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚑

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 23, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 77.5% when pulling 0a87be8 on greenkeeper-seneca-redis-store-1.0.0 into 0d62fde on master.

@mcdonnelldean mcdonnelldean force-pushed the greenkeeper-seneca-redis-store-1.0.0 branch from 0a87be8 to 98f6ca5 Compare June 13, 2016 07:54
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 13, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 76.667% when pulling 98f6ca5 on greenkeeper-seneca-redis-store-1.0.0 into 3f05656 on master.

@mihaidma mihaidma merged commit ffc1fd8 into master Jun 17, 2016
@mcdonnelldean mcdonnelldean deleted the greenkeeper-seneca-redis-store-1.0.0 branch June 17, 2016 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants