Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update writing of hdf5 data #105

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024
Merged

Update writing of hdf5 data #105

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

ladinesa
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ladinesa ladinesa self-assigned this Apr 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@JFRudzinski JFRudzinski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, much nicer, thank you @ladinesa!!

@Bernadette-Mohr once Alvin merges this branch, you should rebase your branch and then you can follow this format for the US stuff. When you do that, can you also add tests for these FE calculation HDF5 quantities? I had not done this yet because I was waiting for this new functionality to be implemented.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8751705030

Details

  • 0 of 4 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.03%) to 88.195%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
atomisticparsers/gromacs/parser.py 0 4 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8438275643: 0.03%
Covered Lines: 6216
Relevant Lines: 7048

💛 - Coveralls

@ladinesa ladinesa merged commit 68f0d2b into develop Apr 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@ladinesa ladinesa deleted the update-hdf5 branch April 19, 2024 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants