New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding nmr workflow #6
Adding nmr workflow #6
Conversation
Defined MagneticOutputs in general.py
My bad. Please, disregard the changes before: I think this workflow makes more sense to be defined in the parsers. Per se, this is a file-format grouping NMR outputs from CASTEP / QE GIPAW, so I would use the utils in the electronic-parsers to handle this situation. As you can see now, I am only defining the |
Due to its simplicity now, I think I will simply merge this into #3 We keep the discussion in there. |
4321e24
into
2-general-base-classes-for-workflows
* Added MagneticOutputs in general.py * Added more imports for usage in __init__
* Added MagneticOutputs in general.py * Added more imports for usage in __init__
* Added MagneticOutputs in general.py * Added more imports for usage in __init__
* Added base classes for DFTMethod and DFTOutputs, and for GWOutputs * Reformatted and using inheritance gw.py * Added TBOutputs and DMFTOutputs to general.py Reformatted dmft.py * Added BeyondDFT2Tasks base class and MaxEntOutputs in general.py Reformatted and inheritance in maxent.py * Reformatted xs.py and photon_polarization.py * Changed inheritance by composition Reformat tb.py * Added composition to XS workflow * Defining ElectronicStructureOutputs for generic complex workflows * Fix bug name * Fixing XS and tests * Changed name to electronic workflows to add Plus * Fix testing * Generalize method in BeyondDFT class * Improved extraction of workflow_name * Adding nmr workflow (#6) * Added MagneticOutputs in general.py * Added more imports for usage in __init__ * Fix testing
@ladinesa I would like to add these changes to the #3 so that I can merge everything together at once with the central nomad. Sorry for the mess, I was careless and worked in the same branch there regarding normalization.
Closes #1