-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 181
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compiling nools from different sources #6
Comments
I agree this would be a great addition, should be in the next release. |
Hi, I'm also interested in this feature. When can we expect it? |
Hi, We plan on addressing both #6 and #5 in the next couple of weeks if you have any specific use cases you would like addressed please provide an example! In the next release we plan on providing the functionality of compiling nools DSL from a stream such as a file stream, once the -Doug |
Hi again, I read some bits of your code and I don't see why there's a conflict with the other issue. Thanks, |
Instead of a string you could use a stream, a stream is more generic and would allow your rules to be read from even an external source, such as a url |
So as of v0.1.0 you can now parse and compile source strings from the -Doug |
Nools should allow compiling flows and rules from different sources. Currently the rules compiler is reading the flow definition file from the file system, this should be changed to be read from a stream, this way people have the flexibility to store the rules wherever they please, in the file system, building them through an interface and storing them in memory, read them from a different location, etc...
The mechanism of having the rules stored only in file systems is neither flexible nor secure, rules might be a critical factor in evaluating business operations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: