#27 test

[cleydyr]

No description provided.

[mgaruccio]

I like the implementation, but I still feel (probably biasedly) that #46 solves the original issue better.

The test's are only not passing because #47 has not been merged yet, once the node version is updated in Travis all tests will pass correctly.

[cleydyr]

Does the implementation of #46 work for associating data to existing cards or is it used just when creating new cards? I haven't confirmed it yet, but from the API description it seems that you can just copy or create new cards with that method, not update it.

[mgaruccio]

Ahh good point would only allow for including it on a new card, rather than on something already existing. so this is definitely worthwhile.

[cleydyr]

Yeah. This would allow for updating existing cards that didn't have a due date defined at creation time, but need it after they are created. #46 is just what I needed for my use case, to be honest (I know the due date at creation time). But the functionality of this PR will surely be requested though.

[mgaruccio]

Agreed, although at this point I'm not sure either will be merged, #46 has been waiting for a while.

[norberteder]

Hey, Thank you so much for your work! I've merged #46 and #47 today. I hope that helps so far. A new version will be released soon.