Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bugfix: don't crash when filtering FloatFields using lt, lte, gt, gte, and range #185

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

bugfix: don't crash when filtering FloatFields using lt, lte, gt, gte, and range #185

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

PoByBolek
Copy link

This feels pretty hacky. I tried doing all conversions in XHValueRangeProcessor but gave up after a while.

@PoByBolek
Copy link
Author

Meh... I forgot about python2

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.005%) to 99.131% when pulling de16460 on PoByBolek:master into 2247b23 on notanumber:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.005%) to 99.131% when pulling de16460 on PoByBolek:master into 2247b23 on notanumber:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.005%) to 99.131% when pulling de16460 on PoByBolek:master into 2247b23 on notanumber:master.

@PoByBolek PoByBolek closed this Apr 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@PoByBolek @coveralls