Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the download last release part from Appveyor script and use the generated SciLexer.dll #9581

Closed
donho opened this issue Feb 25, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@donho
Copy link
Member

donho commented Feb 25, 2021

Currently in Appveyor build, we download SciLixer.dll from the latest release for Unit tests (of function list especially).
In PR #9574 the boost is included in Appveyor build.

We can remove the download last release part from Appveyor script and use the generated SciLexer.dll, since the PR mentioned above has been committed in the branch master.

@donho
Copy link
Member Author

donho commented Feb 25, 2021

@chcg
Could you please remove SUPPORT_XP from the script as well ?

chcg added a commit to chcg/notepad-plus-plus that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2021
- Remove the download last release part from Appveyor script and use the generated SciLexer.dll
- Could you please remove SUPPORT_XP from the script as well ?
@chcg
Copy link
Contributor

chcg commented Feb 27, 2021

@ArkadiuszMichalski Your PR #9583 was already the correct fix for the change needed here. I created now #9581.
@donho Did the requested changes.

donho pushed a commit to donho/notepad-plus-plus that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2021
Currently in Appveyor build, we download SciLixer.dll from the latest release for Unit tests (of function list especially).
In PR notepad-plus-plus#9574 the boost is included in Appveyor build.

In this PR:
- Remove the download last release part from Appveyor script and use the generated SciLexer.dll
- Remove SUPPORT_XP from the script

Fix notepad-plus-plus#9581, close notepad-plus-plus#9591
@donho donho closed this as completed in f2f12b2 Feb 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants