Redesigns #63
Merged
Redesigns #63
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It was the odd spacing accent in the sources, and we don’t have any math-specific data for it.
* Unify their widths * Make them extensible * Unify the double versions and make them extensible as well * Underscore is not an accent and should not be extensible
It does not need them, and no other math font has them.
Consistency is good.
Better sorting.
* Unify its vertical size with the parentheses * Fix its extensible assembly * Make double and triple vertical bars the same size and spacing * Make triple vertical bar extensible
It was incorrectly matching the stems of the smallest size.
Drive them from the braces and make the vertical size match other braces, and add size variants for consistency.
* The top and bottom parts were oddly stretched * The middle part was off center
This was referenced Mar 6, 2024
Move old, straight, integrals to ss02 feature, and add new slanted integral based on the italic f shape. Fixes notofonts#51
This is now significantly different that it should be 3.000.
* Make them a bit wider * Add top/bottom serif to distinguish them from intersection and union operators (fixes notofonts#52) * Make the display version smaller, as it was too big.
khaledhosny
force-pushed
the
redesign
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1f4b594
to
b974f1a
Compare
* Make the summation wider, and make all summations consistent in width * Make all the other operators consistent in size and stem thickness * Do the same for the display versions * Add many missing display versions
* Update to reflect changes to base glyphs * Add missing display versions
If we are going to include these glyphs anyway, we might as well give them the expected order.
* Make them consistent in size across the board, both regular and size variants * Make them consistent in stem thickness, both regular and size variants * Make the larger versions slightly bolder * Add missing size variants to all of them * Make the spacing consistent Overall they look and behave in a consistent way now. This also adds a few hundred more glyphs
It should be much bolder. The old glyph should have been lighttortoiseshellbracketornament instead.
I need to adjust their size and position to work better in math mode.
The italic one should be slanted to the left.
Make them consistent with the base glyphs, but I’ve my doubts about many of them notofonts#7 (comment).
Make the symbol vertically centered. The old position was too low.
These are legacy symbols, but make it that placing them on top of each other (i.e. on two lines) produce display-size summation.
Part of notofonts#65
Part of notofonts#65
Part of notofonts#65
Part of notofonts#65
Part of notofonts#65
Part of notofonts#65
The symbol inside is “logical and” and “logical or”, not circumflex and caron.
Make the overbar look like and overbar not a caron.
Vertically center the minus sign.
Causes the build to add vhea/vmtx tables.
|
I think this is ready now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.