You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2023. It is now read-only.
Customer report:
==========
U+2252 APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO OR THE IMAGE OF appears larger than its sisters
at U+2250..2253. They are expected to be consistent in size.
==========
Original issue reported on code.google.com by xian...@google.com on 29 May 2015 at 10:44
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The customer report is for Android.
The problem turns out that U+2252 comes from Noto Sans CJK, while the rest come
from Noto Sans Symbols.
Ken, What do you think about the size of U+2252? Can it be shortened to match
U+2250..2253 in Noto Sans Symbols (if it doesn't cause other inconsistency).
Original comment by xian...@google.com on 29 May 2015 at 10:48
U+2252 is included Source Han Sans / Noto Sans CJK because it is included in
the major CJK standards (GBK for China, Big Five for Taiwan, JIS X 0208 for
Japan, and KS X 1001 for Korea), and the expectation is that its glyph be
full-width.
Original comment by ken.lu...@gmail.com on 29 May 2015 at 11:18
To record what I said during today's meeting:
IMHO, having full-width glyphs for this and other mathematical operators makes
these characters not so useful in mathematical context. As we made Greek and
Cyrillic proportional, we may as well consider doing the same with these
characters.
Original comment by jshin@chromium.org on 2 Jun 2015 at 12:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
xian...@google.com
on 29 May 2015 at 10:44The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: