Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2023. It is now read-only.

Noto Sans CJK: U+2252 APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO OR THE IMAGE OF appears larger than its sisters at U+2250..2253 #378

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jun 8, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link


Customer report:

==========
U+2252 APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO OR THE IMAGE OF appears larger than its sisters 
at U+2250..2253. They are expected to be consistent in size.
==========

Original issue reported on code.google.com by xian...@google.com on 29 May 2015 at 10:44

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

The customer report is for Android.

The problem turns out that U+2252 comes from Noto Sans CJK, while the rest come 
from Noto Sans Symbols.

Ken, What do you think about the size of U+2252? Can it be shortened to match 
U+2250..2253 in Noto Sans Symbols (if it doesn't cause other inconsistency).

Original comment by xian...@google.com on 29 May 2015 at 10:48

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

U+2252 is included Source Han Sans / Noto Sans CJK because it is included in 
the major CJK standards (GBK for China, Big Five for Taiwan, JIS X 0208 for 
Japan, and KS X 1001 for Korea), and the expectation is that its glyph be 
full-width.

Original comment by ken.lu...@gmail.com on 29 May 2015 at 11:18

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

To record what I said during today's meeting: 

IMHO, having full-width glyphs for this and other mathematical operators makes 
these characters not so useful in mathematical context.  As we made Greek and 
Cyrillic proportional, we may as well consider doing the same with these 
characters. 


Original comment by jshin@chromium.org on 2 Jun 2015 at 12:24

@behdad
Copy link
Contributor

behdad commented Jun 8, 2015

cc @xiangyexiao

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 10, 2015

Moved to notofonts/noto-cjk#24

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Jun 10, 2015
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants