chore: add meenting notes from open rfc call

meetings/2020-04-16.md

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#### Meeting from: April 15th, 2020
+
+# Open RFC Meeting (npm)
+
+### Attendees
+- Darcy Clarke (@darcyclarke)
+- Isaac Z. Schlueter (@isaacs)
+- Jordan Harband (@ljharb)
+- Glenn Hinks (@ghinks)
+- Andrew Hughes (@andrewhughes101)
+- Dominykas Blyžė (@dominykas)
+- Wes Todd (@wesleytodd)
+- Ruy Adorno (@ruyadorno)
+
+### Agenda
+
+1. **Housekeeping**
+	1. Introduction(s)
+	1. Code of Conduct Acknowledgement
+	1. Outline Intentions & Desired Outcomes
+	1. Announcements
+1. **Issue**: [#125 [RRFC] Expose dependents API](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/issues/125)
+1. **Issue**: [#115 [RRFC] Add top level `binDependencies` to package.json](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/issues/115)
+1. **PR**: [#114 RFC: Expand list of ignored files](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/114)
+1. **PR**: [#103 RFC: Add npm workspaces](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/103)
+1. **PR**: [#92 RFC: Add staging workflow for CI and human interoperability](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/92)
+1. **Issue**: [#56 [FEATURE] Create RFC for Yarn Resolutions](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/issues/56)
+1. **PR**: [#129 RFC: Overrides](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/129)
+1. **PR**: [#121 RFC: Add `link#[version](comment)` syntax to `version`](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/121)
+1. **PR**: [#126 RFC: Add types information to the Packument](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/126)
+
+### Notes
+- **dependents API**
+    - darcy: work has been discussed, but website work depends on that API existing
+    - glen:
+        - wish to inform downstream dependents, not just the top 1-2
+        - who will we impact with a breaking change?
+        - inter-generational maintenance transitions
+    - darcy: have a downloads API
+        - a bit limited, but could help inform community and having community create tooling around pkg maintenance
+        - dont' know realistic time frame for exposing dependents API
+        - EOY is earliest possible, can't give any promises
+        - userland tooling, tedious to maintain, but another avenue
+    - glen:
+        - in interim: possible for community members say "this is what we're working on, can you run internally and give us an answer?"
+        - 1 or 2 things we're concerned about changing, express session module, 11M downloads a week
+    - wes:
+        - someone posted on twitter about a BigQuery analysis of github projects and npm packages
+        - could do analysis you'er talking about without npm doing anything, with some $ behind it
+        - could reach out to that person
+    - isaacs: 
+      - graph database would be cool
+      - it would be nice to define boundaries in the OpenRFC call for registry vs cli content
+      - kind of weird to discuss here, the registry team isn't on this call
+      - couchdb views aren't used in production any more, that's why Jordan's PR isn't easy
+    - darcy:
+        - We could have a specific registry call OR
+        - Bring in folks from the registry to the OpenRFC call whenever we have content lined up 
+- **binDependencies**
+    - darcy:
+        - spoke about in last openRFC call as well
+        - looks like jake has been taling to a void unfortunately
+        - isaacs can you follow up?
+    - isaacs:
+        - yes, it's been on my plate, i haven't gotten to it
+        - there are some issues with the proposal itself
+        - want to dig into the use case and see if something else could be a better solution
+- **ignore files and add npm workspaces**
+    - ruy: have action items haven't gotten to yet
+- **workspaces**
+    - ruy:
+        - RFC itself should be good to merge
+        - some tactical merge process questions
+        - made good progress with implementation
+        - have list of projects using workspaces, feedback from wes & jordan, thanks
+        - still development space
+    - darcy:
+        - been testing against lerna/yarn use cases
+        - want people to adopt npm workspaces as easily as possible
+- **staged publishes**
+    - darcy: did deep-dive about a month ago, any update?
+    - isaacs:
+        - need to update RFC and PoC implementation
+        - will take over stewardship of it
+- **yarn-like resolutions type thing**
+    - darcy:
+        - did deep dive last week
+        - stubbed out schema that made a lot of sense, seemed less hairy
+    - isaacs:
+        - major RFC, expect it to take long in order to figure out all edge cases, etc
+    - jordan:
+        - would be nice to have a separable test suite so that resolve can work the same way
+    - isaacs:
+        - pretty intermingled 
+        - arborist buildIdealTree tests are the closest thing we have
+        - the plan is to split appart arborist internals and publish/have them available to the broader community
+- **link syntax proposal**
+    - isaac:
+        - this problem seem to be better adressed with workspaces instead
+    - ruy:
+        - seems like it's coming from a similar kind of pain from the previously discussed `binDependencies` RFC
+    - wes:
+        - let's skip the comment part
+        - let's make sure we poke authors prior to an OpenRFC call
+    - darcy:
+        - absolutely
+        - let's automate that
+- **Add types information to the Packument**
+    - wes:
+        - super helpful
+        - migth be unfair to add something to a specific ecosystem while ignoring others
+    - isaacs:
+        - frameworks rise and fall in popularity
+        - package.json data gets put into the packument so the ecosystem could use it today if they want in the full packument - what we'd need to implement is support to the minified packument
+            - full packument: everything defined in package.json and more
+            - corgi doc: minified packument which only has dependencies, etc - things needed when building the install tree