Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: optimize doxygen docs for C code #270

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

aloisklink
Copy link
Contributor

Enables the OPTIMIZE_OUTPUT_FOR_C Doxygen option.

It basically just renames the list of classes to a list of "Data Structures", since C does not have classes.

Enables the [`OPTIMIZE_OUTPUT_FOR_C`][1] Doxygen option.

It basically just renames the list of classes to a list of
"Data Structures", since C does not have classes.

[1]: https://www.doxygen.nl/manual/config.html#cfg_optimize_output_for_c
@aloisklink aloisklink added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 9, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #270 (e56be99) into main (dfa7bfe) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #270   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.62%   48.62%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines       17916    17916           
=======================================
  Hits         8711     8711           
  Misses       9205     9205           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@mereacre mereacre merged commit 2b27c01 into main Sep 12, 2022
@mereacre mereacre deleted the docs/optimize-docs-for-c-code branch September 12, 2022 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants