Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #497: Fix check on WRAILBOT for TARGET leaves. #519

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

blakewalters
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, in both SYNCVMLC and DYNVMLC, input would
fail if, for target leaves:

width of bottom of support rail (WRAILBOT) <
width of groove (WGROOVE) + width of leaf tip (WTIP)

This restriction is incorrect, based on VARIAN's specs for
the Millenium and HD 120 MLCs. Moreover, it is inconsistent
with the (fixed) check in SYNCHMDMLC. Thus, the check has been
changed so that input fails if:

WRAILBOT>WGROOVE+WTIP

Also, added a check on WTIP for QUARTER/HALF TARGET leaves
in SYNCHDMLC.

rtownson and others added 5 commits November 10, 2016 10:48
Change the elements to be automatically
changed to upper case for pegsless input.
This fixes a crash that occurs when the
elements are not found due to the case
mismatch.
The number of local regions is 3 times the number of pyramid blocks since the inner and outer air regions are actually the same numbered region.
Previously, in both SYNCVMLC and DYNVMLC, input would
fail if, for target leaves:

width of bottom of support rail (WRAILBOT) <
  width of groove (WGROOVE) + width of leaf tip (WTIP)

This restriction is incorrect, based on VARIAN's specs for
the Millenium and HD 120 MLCs.  Moreover, it is inconsistent
with the (fixed) check in SYNCHMDMLC.  Thus, the check has been
changed so that input fails if:

WRAILBOT>WGROOVE+WTIP

Also, added a check on WTIP for QUARTER/HALF TARGET leaves
in SYNCHDMLC.
@blakewalters blakewalters self-assigned this Mar 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants