Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(vite): support incremental builds with nxViteTsPaths #23908

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

Coly010
Copy link
Contributor

@Coly010 Coly010 commented May 21, 2024

Current Behavior

We do not support incremental builds with vite when using inference plugin

Expected Behavior

Support incremental builds with vite when using inference plugin

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

@Coly010 Coly010 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2024 16:24
@Coly010 Coly010 requested a review from jaysoo May 21, 2024 16:24
@Coly010 Coly010 self-assigned this May 21, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nx-dev ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 22, 2024 0:34am

@Coly010 Coly010 force-pushed the support-incremental-builds-with-vite branch 2 times, most recently from 8c46e46 to 64ac4b3 Compare May 22, 2024 11:14
@Coly010 Coly010 force-pushed the support-incremental-builds-with-vite branch from 64ac4b3 to 4cfdfaf Compare May 22, 2024 11:32
@Coly010 Coly010 merged commit 64c6287 into master May 22, 2024
6 checks passed
@Coly010 Coly010 deleted the support-incremental-builds-with-vite branch May 22, 2024 15:30
Copy link

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 28, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants