TestNet replication fails

[cthulhu-rider]

TestNet nodes couldn't replicate following object from public container:

`error replicator/process.go:62 could not replicate object {"component": "Object Replicator", "node": "03000a222431891c481f2fbce61297547e816e164750f5ea94e2831c219bbe3504", "object": "GqNR1XtkucMcxE86FtALjVUSFVREa9ZMF2fbmeXEffJV/JDbZcmiZWCXRocjHU6i9ZHqJZzTDrhk2HEET33vxJJ6s", "error": "(*putsvc.RemoteSender) could not send object: (*putsvc.remoteTarget) could not put object to [/dns4/st4.t5.fs.neo.org/tcp/8080]: write object via client: status: code = 1024 message = (*object.FormatValidator) different owner identifiers NfFA5g92e32YvraVmipA9oY8AjvbdgFdjY/NTBbJxp2PrPXS7XyhKVqroifvsp1QCttif"}`

• related to Ban (?) tokens issued to self #2226
• related to Incorrectly formed object can settle in the container #2228

Object header

{
 "objectID": {
  "value": "/9C6LFl8idDEXZkO2IqLNF/N0vu2BA4E+G99G9+CN3A="
 },
 "signature": {
  "key": "A+qfZG1VP/zKSoVnaIB/NsOai41YqytrClLhzlf6pwRE",
  "signature": "BLq0vchZwYe2DCpv0sGimobdCDEkeD0QdnShYNBznuz3TEZ3UU8HmFAUolJq39XUcOarMpDtymJ1fP4k/JrEzOw=",
  "scheme": "ECDSA_SHA512"
 },
 "header": {
  "version": {
   "major": 2,
   "minor": 13
  },
  "containerID": {
   "value": "60NlQ51V5mQDv/0DZMHekhnpD0N2yjq+ReUZP7djEw4="
  },
  "ownerID": {
   "value": "NdQLY1OAj6haumXulx75g8U8AHCrgcyB0w=="
  },
  "creationEpoch": "3957",
  "payloadLength": "934",
  "payloadHash": {
   "type": "SHA256",
   "sum": "OYaobpuA4NsULlr/f5QlVehg5yGzYYT/Zo4ZCFORvwo="
  },
  "objectType": "REGULAR",
  "homomorphicHash": {
   "type": "TZ",
   "sum": "OJUz8c7ztGq7b3Pdjrr9lB9AW/ABOFDAVX9YQ5Td7NJI5wE7MzU0qIsg/1dsv4ikatApgTwLXRC0K6dSDJK6og=="
  },
  "sessionToken": {
   "body": {
    "id": "AOSylokkRlSYavM5g73COQ==",
    "ownerID": {
     "value": "NdQLY1OAj6haumXulx75g8U8AHCrgcyB0w=="
    },
    "lifetime": {
     "exp": "18446744073709551615",
     "nbf": "1",
     "iat": "1"
    },
    "sessionKey": "AzddiSt+TksLbrFOf51nuliAiqacHYeFQVM2rzvbu0ew",
    "object": {
     "verb": "PUT",
     "target": {
      "container": {
       "value": "60NlQ51V5mQDv/0DZMHekhnpD0N2yjq+ReUZP7djEw4="
      },
      "objects": []
     }
    }
   },
   "signature": {
    "key": "AzddiSt+TksLbrFOf51nuliAiqacHYeFQVM2rzvbu0ew",
    "signature": "BPUjuTlmySAAis9eeARiZfjmiCBGiHiHNuB4A69N7ojjWc39NRcuuUYVOBPNsS6BJ/V5HNSPgCIBeuLAA9a7sS8=",
    "scheme": "ECDSA_SHA512"
   }
  },
  "attributes": [
   {
    "key": "FileName",
    "value": "./test_file"
   },
   {
    "key": "Timestamp",
    "value": "1675349616"
   }
  ],
  "split": null
 },
 "payload": ""
}

[roman-khimov]

So we have a container owned by NfFA5g92e32YvraVmipA9oY8AjvbdgFdjY and an object signed by

"key": "A+qfZG1VP/zKSoVnaIB/NsOai41YqytrClLhzlf6pwRE",

which is NTBbJxp2PrPXS7XyhKVqroifvsp1QCttif. Then we have a session token with

"sessionKey": "AzddiSt+TksLbrFOf51nuliAiqacHYeFQVM2rzvbu0ew",

in the token signed by

"key": "AzddiSt+TksLbrFOf51nuliAiqacHYeFQVM2rzvbu0ew",

Both correspond to NfFA5g92e32YvraVmipA9oY8AjvbdgFdjY address. A container owner signed a token for himself, it's attached to the object, but the key that signed the object is different (not a part of a token, nor a container owner key). When I was looking at #2226 I had an impression that the object is in fact signed by the same (NfFA5g92e32YvraVmipA9oY8AjvbdgFdjY in out case) key, but it's different. If we have it in the store this likely means that it can be created because of basic/extended ACL rules that allow this to happen, right? Which then means that it should be able to replicate.