Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refact more imports #2581

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 23, 2018
Merged

Refact more imports #2581

merged 2 commits into from Feb 23, 2018

Conversation

theengineear
Copy link
Contributor

Some more cleaning up! I haven't run this yet as a sanity check. I can do that in the am.

@@ -296,19 +296,22 @@ export function watchSpawn(action$: *, store: *) {
return action$.pipe(
ofType(actionTypes.LAUNCH_KERNEL_SUCCESSFUL),
switchMap((action: NewKernelAction) => {
// $FlowFixMe
const spawn = action.kernel.spawn;
Copy link
Member

@rgbkrk rgbkrk Feb 23, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These make sense since our kernel is nullable. It's only too bad that the rx types don't pass on through because then we could do a filter that ensured there was a kernel and that it was a zeromq / local type.

I'll stick in some workarounds here at least.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ha, yah, I tried to filter it above to no avail :(.

@rgbkrk
Copy link
Member

rgbkrk commented Feb 23, 2018

Running this locally:

  • Desktop
  • Jupyter extension

@rgbkrk rgbkrk merged commit c9fa8c8 into nteract:master Feb 23, 2018
@rgbkrk
Copy link
Member

rgbkrk commented Feb 23, 2018

Looking great! Thanks!

@theengineear theengineear deleted the refact-more-imports branch February 23, 2018 17:00
@rgbkrk rgbkrk added this to the Jupyter Extension M1 milestone Feb 28, 2018
@rgbkrk rgbkrk mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2018
7 tasks
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented May 1, 2018

Howdy! I'm 🔓🤖!

In order to keep information timely (based on the most recent release), we want all activity to be added to either new issues or open issues and PRs. In service to that goal, I, the lock bot close inactive closed issues when they haven't had activity in 120 days.

Feel free to open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments from this thread.

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 1, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants