Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Old link to JobFile Reference #4

Closed
Mike4Online opened this issue Jun 17, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Old link to JobFile Reference #4

Mike4Online opened this issue Jun 17, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@Mike4Online
Copy link

The home page of this GitHub project (i.e. the README) has a link to the JobFile Reference Guide. This link is for an old version (7.5 or 7.6). This link should be updated to point to the current JobFile Reference Guide, at the following URL:

https://download.nuix.com/system/files/Nuix%20Collector%20and%20ECC%20JobFile%20Reference%20Guide%20v8.6.pdf

  • Michael Litwak (Nuix employee)
@JuicyDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Updating now, thank you for reporting this and providing the updated link 😄

@Mike4Online
Copy link
Author

Thanks for updating the link. I just realized that the JobFile Reference does not cover remediation-specific elements in the JobFile. These are intentionally left undocumented in the JobFile Reference, because remediation capabilities are intended to be driven by Workstation.

The Collections Team generates a RemeditionLib library, which allows Workstation to perform remediation. We have a customized version of the JobFile XML Schema to accompany RemediationLib. This schema includes a comprehensive set of documentation comments for all possible JobFile elements and attributes, including remediation-related items. Still, an XML Schema file is not the ideal way to deploy reference documentation.

I am considering writing a supplementary PDF document to cover remediation-related JobFile settings. I am not sure where I would publish this doc - perhaps having it here in this GitHub repository would be best. What do you think?

@JuicyDragon
Copy link
Contributor

JuicyDragon commented Jun 17, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants