-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cherry pick for 0.55.1 #7789
Cherry pick for 0.55.1 #7789
Conversation
CUDA: Fix linking with PTX when compiling lazily
…tation_pass Move the type annotation pass to post legalization.
CUDA: Fixes missing type annotation pass following numba#7704
Update URLs in error messages to refer to RTD docs.
CUDA Python 11.6 support
…_year Fix the release year for Numba 0.55 change log entry.
Fix numba#7713: Ensure _prng_random_hash return has correct bitwidth
Fix numba#7751: Use original filename for array exprs
…line_test Avoid issue with DI gen for arrayexprs.
Handle Omitted/OmittedArgDataModel in DI generation.
Fixing issue 7693
Fix issues with locating/parsing source during DebugInfo emission.
Refactor threading layer priority tests to not use stdout/stderr
CUDA: Deprecate support for CC < 5.3 and CTK < 10.2
Since the CI configuration for this branch is somewhat outdated, we opted to test this branch with the CI configuration at: |
gpuci run tests |
1 similar comment
gpuci run tests |
Can we re-run that failed build? |
Maybe, but I doubt it would help:
|
@gmarkall I have pinned Numpy on 3.10 explicitly now too: bbf2973 |
build farm was green on this |
#7793 was fully green now. |
update change-log for 0.55.1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me - the cherry-picks match the PRs that were for 0.55.1, and I understand the buildfarm run was a full one including CUDA (gpuCI is not running right now for some reason).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thank you @gmarkall |
We are ignoring public CI for this one, see comments above for notes on the verification. |
🍒