Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #6444: pruner issues with reference stealing functions #6446
Fix #6444: pruner issues with reference stealing functions #6446
Changes from 5 commits
ca53ac9
f7e3e5f
441d8cd
5b1d386
ffb867b
3188584
eb596fb
13b9569
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure what this is trying to convey? Is it that the old pass works on textual IR, so the bitcode repr has to be optimised by LLVM whilst as bitcode, then converted to text, optimisations run on this text and then materialised back to bitcode?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I agree it wasn't written clearly. I didn't actually change it though, just shuffled the line-breaks around to fit.
(the lazy part of me doesn't want to change it since it's going away very soon)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree on the basis that only core developers adjusted it and it's being retired. Apart from adding the missing "the" above, let's just leave it.