This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
Give clear exception when clients try to reuse ClassiferResults #1342
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mrcslws
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2017
| result_.insert(pair<Int, vector<Real64>*>(step, v)); | ||
| } | ||
| NTA_CHECK(it == result_.end()) | ||
| << "The ClassifierResult cannot be reused!"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe just use
NTA_CHECK(result_.count(step) == 0);and get rid of the iterator.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is to address a community reported segfault by making it clear that you cannot reuse ClassificationResult instances across calls to SDRClassifier.compute. I looked into having
computesimply return a new ClassifierResult but it looked like a major refactoring and I wasn't sure I was doing the right thing so punting on that for now.@mrcslws please review
@ywcui1990 fyi