Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Repo name #6

Closed
melissawm opened this issue Jun 8, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Repo name #6

melissawm opened this issue Jun 8, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@melissawm
Copy link
Member

The docs team had a discussion about this and figured that we might want to change the repo name so it can also contain how tos, instead of just tutorials. Suggestions included

  • numpy-cookbook: will this clash with SciPy Cookbook?
  • numpy-recipes: this might be an alternative that avoids confusion with the existing SciPy Cookbook project.

cc @rossbar @bjnath

@rossbar
Copy link
Collaborator

rossbar commented Jun 9, 2020

These seem like nice ideas - I don't really have a strong feeling for anything in particular.

Re: the scipy cookbook - it would be nice if we could get some clarity on the status of that project and whether it's actively maintained and, if not, whether more attention would be welcome. There's a whole "chapter" dedicated to NumPy, but (with two exceptions) the "recipes" are over a decade old. That's not to say they're not valuable, but just an indication that they probably haven't received any attention in a while!

@bjnath
Copy link
Contributor

bjnath commented Jun 9, 2020

@rossbar That was my understanding too from later in the call when we talked about uniting the doc efforts of at least some of the numeric Python projects. I've opened issue #9 for this thread.

@bsipocz
Copy link
Member

bsipocz commented Mar 16, 2023

Is the rename still on the table or shall we close this issue now?

@bsipocz bsipocz added the question Further information is requested label Mar 16, 2023
@rossbar
Copy link
Collaborator

rossbar commented Mar 18, 2023

I think there's enough inertia at this point that it's safe to close!

@rossbar rossbar closed this as completed Mar 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants