You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, rather ugly axisa, axisb, axisc, or just axis have to be provided. I assume it could be added to overwrite the existing keywords for backward compatibility. I propose that the new axes keyword may be an iterable (or tuple) of length two or three, withe the third value defaulting to axisc or -1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be great to have an "axes" keyword in
np.cross
for consistent API tonp.tensordot
.Reproducing code example:
Currently, rather ugly
axisa
,axisb
,axisc
, or justaxis
have to be provided. I assume it could be added to overwrite the existing keywords for backward compatibility. I propose that the newaxes
keyword may be an iterable (or tuple) of length two or three, withe the third value defaulting toaxisc
or-1
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: