Fix highlighting of spread subexpressions in records #11202
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
amtoine
reviewed
Dec 1, 2023
Not really, no. I looked for |
|
okey no worries 👍 i mean it would just be great if it was possible to get the result of the hint as the output of some function and test that somewhere so that we make sure the |
WindSoilder
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2023
hardfau1t
pushed a commit
to hardfau1t/nushell
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2023
<!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> It turns out that I left a bug in [nushell#11144](nushell#11144), which introduced a spread operator in record literals. When highlighting subexpressions that are spread inside records, the spread operator and the token before it are insert twice. Currently, when you type `{ ...() }`, this is what you'll see:  With the PR, the behavior is as expected:  I'm still not sure how `FlatShape` works, I just copied the existing logic for flattening key-value pairs in records, so it's possible there's still issues, but I haven't found any yet (tried spreading subexpressions, variables, and records). # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> Highlighting for subexpressions spread inside records should no longer be screwed up. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> Is there any way to test flattening/syntax highlighting? # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
dmatos2012
pushed a commit
to dmatos2012/nushell
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
<!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> It turns out that I left a bug in [nushell#11144](nushell#11144), which introduced a spread operator in record literals. When highlighting subexpressions that are spread inside records, the spread operator and the token before it are insert twice. Currently, when you type `{ ...() }`, this is what you'll see:  With the PR, the behavior is as expected:  I'm still not sure how `FlatShape` works, I just copied the existing logic for flattening key-value pairs in records, so it's possible there's still issues, but I haven't found any yet (tried spreading subexpressions, variables, and records). # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> Highlighting for subexpressions spread inside records should no longer be screwed up. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> Is there any way to test flattening/syntax highlighting? # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
It turns out that I left a bug in #11144, which introduced a spread operator in record literals. When highlighting subexpressions that are spread inside records, the spread operator and the token before it are insert twice. Currently, when you type
{ ...() }, this is what you'll see:With the PR, the behavior is as expected:
I'm still not sure how
FlatShapeworks, I just copied the existing logic for flattening key-value pairs in records, so it's possible there's still issues, but I haven't found any yet (tried spreading subexpressions, variables, and records).User-Facing Changes
Highlighting for subexpressions spread inside records should no longer be screwed up.
Tests + Formatting
Is there any way to test flattening/syntax highlighting?
After Submitting