You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Get rid of the second-level nested array in diffs unless the diff type is actually an array (e.g. spec[0].diff[0] when diffing two strings)
It's confused me and everyone else I know who's had to learn it
It makes provider code harder to read / leads to smelly code (e.g. "why is [0] always hardcoded for the nested array?")
Some design is needed
It may be difficult to embed the schema in the differ itself, perhaps we need a second pass on the differ results which will run against the schema and flatten unneeded vectors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Get rid of the second-level nested array in diffs unless the diff type is actually an array (e.g.
spec[0].diff[0]
when diffing two strings)Some design is needed
It may be difficult to embed the schema in the differ itself, perhaps we need a second pass on the differ results which will run against the schema and flatten unneeded vectors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: