NXDRIVE-2721: [Windows] Correctly handle WinError 32

[BoboTiG]

Co-authored-by: Romain Grasland rgrasland@nuxeo.com

[nuxeojenkins]

View issue in JIRA: NXDRIVE-2721: [Windows] Correctly handle WinError 32

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2911 (69f257e) into master (5985f19) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2911   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.23%   45.23%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines       15192    15192           
=======================================
  Hits         6872     6872           
  Misses       8320     8320           

Flag	Coverage Δ
functional	35.85% <ø> (ø)
unit	35.67% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
nxdrive/engine/queue_manager.py	37.91% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5985f19...69f257e. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	5.44 ⭐	5.44 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	40.79 ⭐	40.79 ⭐	0.00
Working memory	4.79 ⭐	4.79 ⭐	0.00
Quality	82.08% ⭐	82.08% ⭐	0.00%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	291	291	0

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
nxdrive/engine/queue_manager.py	82.08% ⭐	82.08% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
nxdrive/engine/queue_manager.py	QueueManager.launch_processors	16 🙂	164 😞	9 🙂	48.69% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods
nxdrive/engine/queue_manager.py	QueueItem.__repr__	0 ⭐	24 ⭐	10 😞	80.74% ⭐	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!