-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wip check fors3 (Sourcery refactored) #270
Conversation
Sourcery AI seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
Sourcery Code Quality Report✅ Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.01%.
Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:
Legend and ExplanationThe emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:
The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request. Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated. We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come! Help us improve this quality report! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## wip-check-fors3 #270 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage 96.29% 96.29%
================================================
Files 29 29
Lines 1808 1808
================================================
Hits 1741 1741
Misses 67 67
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
1ab38dc
to
23369a7
Compare
23369a7
to
ef6b15b
Compare
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Found the following improvement in Function ChunkUploaderS3._state
:
to_upload = set(range(1, self.chunk_count + 1, 1)) - set( | ||
to_upload = set(range(1, self.chunk_count + 1)) - set( | ||
self.blob.uploadedChunkIds | ||
) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function ChunkUploaderS3._compute_chunks_left
refactored with the following changes:
- Replace range(x, y, 1) with range(x, y) (
remove-unit-step-from-range
)
Pull Request #269 refactored by Sourcery.
If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.
NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.
See our documentation here.
Run Sourcery locally
Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:
Review changes via command line
To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the
wip-check-fors3
branch, then run:Help us improve this pull request!