Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(webpack): allow configuring esbuild-loader options #21436

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 7, 2023
Merged

feat(webpack): allow configuring esbuild-loader options #21436

merged 2 commits into from Jun 7, 2023

Conversation

danielroe
Copy link
Member

🔗 Linked issue

#20631 (comment)

❓ Type of change

  • 📖 Documentation (updates to the documentation or readme)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • 👌 Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

📚 Description

This allows configuring the esbuild loader options via webpack.loaders.esbuild.

📝 Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@danielroe danielroe requested a review from pi0 June 7, 2023 10:10
@danielroe danielroe self-assigned this Jun 7, 2023
@danielroe danielroe merged commit 525a06a into main Jun 7, 2023
22 checks passed
@danielroe danielroe deleted the feat/webpack-esbuild-options branch June 7, 2023 12:50
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 7, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pi0 pi0 pi0 approved these changes

Assignees

@danielroe danielroe

Labels
3.x enhancement 🍰 p2-nice-to-have webpack
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@danielroe @pi0