Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: worker-pool uses default count and not collect coverage in appveyor #3581

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 24, 2018

Conversation

clarkdo
Copy link
Member

@clarkdo clarkdo commented Jul 24, 2018

…ine)

@clarkdo clarkdo changed the title refactor: change maxWorkers to default value (cores available on mach… WIP refactor: change maxWorkers to default value (cores available on mach… Jul 24, 2018
@clarkdo clarkdo changed the title WIP refactor: change maxWorkers to default value (cores available on mach… refactor: worker-pool uses default count and not collect coverage in appveyor Jul 24, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 24, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #3581 into dev will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #3581   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.65%   98.65%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1114     1114           
  Branches      300      300           
=======================================
  Hits         1099     1099           
  Misses         13       13           
  Partials        2        2

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e814b34...376a490. Read the comment docs.

@clarkdo clarkdo merged commit cff7696 into nuxt:dev Jul 24, 2018
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 31, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2018
@clarkdo clarkdo deleted the jest-max-workers branch April 2, 2019 13:09
@danielroe danielroe added the 2.x label Jan 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants