-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(cli): don't use absolute path of .cache/nuxt
as transpilation pattern
#7775
Conversation
…attern closes `nuxt-edge` doesn't respect targets in generation nuxt#7774
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #7775 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.85% 68.83% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 90 90
Lines 3824 3825 +1
Branches 1034 1035 +1
==========================================
Hits 2633 2633
Misses 968 968
- Partials 223 224 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If absolute path is problematic, shall we ensure it is always relative pattern or remove static.cacheDir support at all or add a warning for full path?
@pi0 I don't think a relative path will work either (e.g. with a leading One approach: 4a3ba0d |
closes #7774
If
static.cacheDir
isn't set, this won't add the fully resolved cache directory but instead just.cache/nuxt
as a transpilation pattern.Type of change
Description
Resolves #7774
Checklist