Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: opt in to import.meta.* properties #1561

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 25, 2024
Merged

fix: opt in to import.meta.* properties #1561

merged 2 commits into from Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

danielroe
Copy link
Member

πŸ”— Linked issue

❓ Type of change

  • πŸ“– Documentation (updates to the documentation or readme)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • πŸ‘Œ Enhancement (improving an existing functionality)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

πŸ“š Description

This is a very early PR to make this module compatible with changes we expect to release in Nuxt v5.

In Nuxt v3.7.0 we added support for import.meta.* (see original PR) and we've been gradually updating docs and moving across from the old process.* patterned variables.

As I'm sure you're aware, these variables are replaced at build-time and enable tree-shaking in bundled code.
This change affects runtime code (that is, that is processed by the Nuxt bundler, like vite or webpack) rather than code running in Node. So it really doesn't matter what the string is, but it makes more sense in an ESM-world to use import.meta rather than process.

(It might be worth updating the module compatibility as well to indicate it needs to have Nuxt v3.7.0+, but I'll leave that with you if you think this is a good approach.)

πŸ“ Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@benjamincanac benjamincanac merged commit cc62e34 into dev Mar 25, 2024
2 checks passed
@benjamincanac benjamincanac deleted the process-client branch March 25, 2024 16:58
@benjamincanac
Copy link
Member

Thanks Daniel 😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants