New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bivio probability #144
Comments
so you want to exclude the probabily if 'probability` is set at 12, you want always the 50% of the signal to out A and 50 % out B ? |
Well, yes, and no, because it keeps switching. So the signal always goes to A or to B, not to both. |
ok, understand you want understand (but it becomes the same as the mutable instrument switch) |
guess you're right. I only use that for triggers, but now that you mention
it, I realise it can also be used for cv. But it cannot route two into one
(like Oivib).
…On Mon, 4 Feb 2019, 18:28 nysthi ***@***.*** wrote:
ok, understand you want
if full CCW, always to A
if full CW, always B
if 12 50% probabilty to GO A or B
if 10 o clock 60 % to GO A and 40 to B
if 2 o clock 40 % to GO A and 60 to B
understand (but it becomes the same as the mutable instrument switch)
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#144 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AfyGGRuxk_KTa-KMjWS_C2tB6FlsrxrAks5vKG2lgaJpZM4ag-JC>
.
|
Just checked, Bernouilli gate can only be used to pass triggers (pulses, clock signals) to A or B, with probability. |
Well, I just remembered there were some switches very much like I proposed here. PvC Heads and PvC Tails are two-to-one and one-to-two switches with probability and all sorts of extras, like trig and gate out on switching moments, etc. I even helped developing them (a bit) But I thought they had disappeared, the developer seems to have abandoned the VCV ship, and I doubt they will survive the 1.0 transition. Unless someone picks it up, it's open source, after all. |
ok, changed but I need a name in the new mode is the probability to go to A or to B I 've called it "USE equal probabilities in the middle" |
what about mode 1: A/B switching probability
mode 2 (the new one) A/B routing probability
…On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, 14:32 nysthi ***@***.*** wrote:
ok, changed but I need a name
In the normal mode (as it is now)
the probability is the probability to move from the current position
so the history is important,
for example if you are on B
and probabiliy is at 5% means the only 1 times on 20 (on average) the
bivio switch to A
(and viceversa)
in the new mode is the probability to go to A or to B
the starting position is not important
if the probability is at 5%, 19 times out of 20 will switch to A, always
I 've called it "USE equal probabilities in the middle"
but I don't like the name
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#144 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AfyGGXMDU7yVMpT-F2GvdR1-QJAOsV9Rks5vKYgAgaJpZM4ag-JC>
.
|
I need a name for the menu "USE A/B switching probability mode" (the current mode, and default mode) a checkflag will indicate the active mode |
well, to me that would be explaining the functionality pretty clearly, so
why not?
…On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, 14:49 nysthi ***@***.*** wrote:
I need a name for the menu
do you propose to have 2 menu items ? with full title ? (can be done)
"USE A/B switching probability mode" (the current mode, and default mode)
and
"USE A/B routing probability mode"
a checkflag will indicate the active mode
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#144 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AfyGGXxdU9gurNPZKEXjFCwIRtWQe0ciks5vKYv1gaJpZM4ag-JC>
.
|
done will be in 0.6.40 |
now I'm curious, where did the name Bivio come from?
…On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, 15:19 nysthi ***@***.*** wrote:
done will be in 0.6.40
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#144 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AfyGGZBsTjz8Xd5BkMqFe91Uf-8fLqauks5vKZLogaJpZM4ag-JC>
.
|
Bivio means fork, bifurcation in italian |
pronounced beeveeou (english) |
Right now, the Bivio probability attenuverter (and cv input) will give you more or less switching.
But wouldn't it be great if the probability attenuverter will give you more left/more right? So you can set the balance? More output 1, more output 2?
You could also make this a right click option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: