Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix RIC velocity computation and test it better #210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

ChristopherRabotin
Copy link
Member

Summary

The computation of the velocity vector in the RIC frame was incorrect.

Architectural Changes

No change

New Features

No change

Improvements

No change

Bug Fixes

RIC velocity vector fixed.

Testing and validation

  • Test that for the different conics, the RIC computation is reciprocal when simply transposing the blocks of the 6x6 DCM.

Documentation

This PR does not primarily deal with documentation changes.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.94%. Comparing base (97effc2) to head (f032519).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #210   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.94%   79.94%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        8884     8887    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         7102     7105    +3     
  Misses       1782     1782           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ChristopherRabotin ChristopherRabotin merged commit 9201911 into master Mar 13, 2024
22 checks passed
@ChristopherRabotin ChristopherRabotin deleted the hotfix/ric-velocity branch March 13, 2024 03:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant