Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Multiple imputation and LOOIC #17

Open
sharrison5 opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Multiple imputation and LOOIC #17

sharrison5 opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@sharrison5
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right

Comments

@sharrison5
Copy link
Collaborator

3de5e1a added support for multiple imputation during data processing and model fitting. However, there is still no obvious way to use this multiple data for model comparison via the LOOIC (see e.g. paul-buerkner/brms#997). Currently output warning:

Using only the first imputed data set. Please interpret the results with caution until a more principled approach has been implemented.

The approach suggested in the above issue does not seem to work in this instance (i.e. there is no change to the output of brms::loo when using newdata, other than the warning disappearing).

Need to look into whether e.g. MAMI could help in this instance.
@sharrison5 sharrison5 self-assigned this Dec 17, 2020
@sharrison5 sharrison5 added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Dec 17, 2020
@sharrison5 sharrison5 mentioned this issue Dec 20, 2020
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sharrison5 sharrison5

Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sharrison5