Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add first_seen and last_seen to relationship #11

Closed
johnwunder opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Add first_seen and last_seen to relationship #11

johnwunder opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@johnwunder
Copy link

Allan has suggested adding first_seen and last_seen fields (both optional, presumably) to the relationship object. This would let you track, for example, the time period when a malware object was used-by an intrusion-set.

@skelley1
Copy link

skelley1 commented Mar 5, 2018

This was discussed on the working call on Sept 5, 2017. The agreed consensus for text was:

start_time: This optional timestamp represents the earliest time at which the relationship between the objects exists. If the timestamp field #1 is a future timestamp, at the time of the updated field is defined, then this represents an estimate by the producer of the intelligence on the earliest time at which relationship will be asserted to be true. If not specified, then the earliest time at which the relationship between the objects exists is not defined.

end_time: This optional timestamp represents the latest time at which the relationship between the objects exists. If the timestamp field #2 is a future timestamp, at the time of the updated field is defined, then this represents an estimate by the producer of the intelligence on the latest time at which relationship will be asserted to be true. If the timestamp field #2 is defined, then it MUST be later than the timestamp #1 value. If not specified, then the latest time at which the relationship between the objects exists is not defined.

There were no voiced objections to this consensus, so once the editorial work is done on the spec, this issue can be closed.

@johnwunder johnwunder modified the milestones: STIX 2.1 - Development, STIX 2.1 CSD01 Apr 25, 2018
@johnwunder
Copy link
Author

This has been changed in the spec, closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
STIX 2.1
  
Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants