Add type metadata for basic display/rendering information

[bc-pi]

This is qualified with "for example" but the type metadata in the PR currently doesn't define this stuff. I'm still unsure about leaving portions of sd-jwt-vc-types like claims and display out of this PR. But should we at least track that in an issue?

Originally posted by @bc-pi in #220 (comment)

the "stuff" mentioned was other content/concepts from https://github.com/vcstuff/sd-jwt-vc-types, which PR #220 was based on

[danielfett]

For an MVP (i.e., our next draft release), we should IMO add:

• Basic display/rendering information for the credential itself
• Basic display/rendering information for claims
• JSON schema

[babisRoutis]

A single issue tracking the features to be added (from types), I think, is not so convenient.

Perhaps it would be better to use some more specific labels like for instance meta-display and /or meta-claims for annotate related issues. In this way, issues reported to types repo can be transferred here and new issues can be added freely.

[awoie]

A single issue tracking the features to be added (from types), I think, is not so convenient.

Perhaps it would be better to use some more specific labels like for instance meta-display and /or meta-claims for annotate related issues. In this way, issues reported to types repo can be transferred here and new issues can be added freely.

You can also create new issues if you believe other things are missing for your use case.