Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Import 'population' from elsewhere #632

Open
obi-bot opened this issue Jan 14, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Import 'population' from elsewhere #632

obi-bot opened this issue Jan 14, 2013 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
admin:auto-migrated from svn comments Pre-Github, issues were put in editor comments.

Comments

@obi-bot
Copy link

obi-bot commented Jan 14, 2013

OBI_0000181 is outside of OBI scope and should be imported from some other ontology. See the discussion here: http://code.google.com/p/ogms/issues/detail?id=33

Reported by: jamesaoverton

Original Ticket: obi/obi-terms/646

@obi-bot
Copy link
Author

obi-bot commented Jan 14, 2013

  • assigned_to: nobody --> jamesaoverton

Original comment by: jamesaoverton

@johnwjudkins
Copy link
Contributor

johnwjudkins commented Jul 27, 2020

Discussed on 2020-07-27. Agreeing to obsolete OBI term. We should import the 2 PCO terms: 'collection of organisms' and 'collection of humans', and replace the use of current OBI term with those.

@ramonawalls
Copy link

Thanks for including the PCO term. You might also want to import some of the more specific subclasses of 'collection of organisms', definitely 'collection of humans' as @johnwjudkins suggested. I am hoping that soon we will migrate 'collection of organisms' to the new Core ontology.

@jamesaoverton Please let me know if you see any issue with the PCO definitions. I am working on a new release now.

@linikujp
Copy link

Is this being fixed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin:auto-migrated from svn comments Pre-Github, issues were put in editor comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants