Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

redundant-levels-with-siblings.yaml:34-39: Fix problem... #2175

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2185
Closed

redundant-levels-with-siblings.yaml:34-39: Fix problem... #2175

0pdd opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2185
Assignees

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Jun 21, 2023

The puzzle 2126-624e8604 from #2126 has to be resolved:

# @todo #2126:90min Fix problem with redundant objects.
# Enabling synthetic-attributes-with-to-java.yaml test case still fails.
# The possible reason is the wrong behaviour of abstracts-float-up.xsl
# or remove-levels.xsl transformations. As you can see from the comment above
# - we have strange argument @ that passes into main$t1$first and
# main$t1$second objects which is considered wrong and can cause some problems.

The puzzle was created by rultor on 21-Jun-23.

Estimate: 90 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@volodya-lombrozo volodya-lombrozo self-assigned this Jun 21, 2023
volodya-lombrozo added a commit to volodya-lombrozo/eo that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2023
volodya-lombrozo added a commit to volodya-lombrozo/eo that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2023
volodya-lombrozo added a commit to volodya-lombrozo/eo that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2023
volodya-lombrozo added a commit to volodya-lombrozo/eo that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants