Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(#3152): not mandatory comments on level more than 2 #3153

Conversation

maxonfjvipon
Copy link
Member

@maxonfjvipon maxonfjvipon commented Apr 27, 2024

Closes: #3152


PR-Codex overview

This PR enhances the codebase by refining comments and updating object properties in various .eo files. It also improves error handling in the Java code.

Detailed summary

  • Updated comments for abstract objects in multiple .eo files.
  • Revised object properties and method calls in .eo files.
  • Enhanced error handling logic in Java code for comments validation.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

@maxonfjvipon
Copy link
Member Author

@yegor256 please check

@yegor256
Copy link
Member

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Apr 28, 2024

@rultor merge

@yegor256 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit 429a08e into objectionary:master Apr 28, 2024
20 checks passed
@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Apr 28, 2024

@rultor merge

@yegor256 Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 17min)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

We can allow not to comment named abstract objects on level >= 2
3 participants