Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 30, 2021. It is now read-only.

merge DOID:3672 'rhabdoid cancer' + DOID:3674 'kidney rhabdoid cancer' #38

Open
cmungall opened this issue Apr 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Member

cmungall commented Apr 7, 2015

same thing?

@sbello
Copy link
Contributor

sbello commented Apr 7, 2015

Not the same thing. You can have extrarenal rhabdoid tumors. See
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/993084-overview.
Sue

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com
wrote:

same thing?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38.

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

cmungall commented Apr 7, 2015

OK, unfortunately DO bakes in the assumption that it's kidney:

 / DOID:4 ! disease
  is_a DOID:14566 ! disease of cellular proliferation
   is_a DOID:162 ! cancer
    is_a DOID:0050686 ! organ system cancer
     is_a DOID:3996 ! urinary system cancer
      is_a DOID:263 ! kidney cancer
       is_a DOID:3675 ! childhood kidney neoplasm
        is_a DOID:3672 ! rhabdoid cancer *** 
         is_a DOID:3674 ! kidney rhabdoid cancer

And the def of the parent of parent is
DOID:263 ! kidney cancer [DEF: "A urinary system cancer that is located_in the kidney."]
If this was 'in or around' it could justify the placement

I'm seeing this a lot: generic parent, specific child, but the graph forces everything that makes the child special onto the parent.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants