New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UBERON:0000010 pulling in bad synonyms from NeuroNames:247 (UBERON:0002888) #1214

Closed
tgbugs opened this Issue May 5, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@tgbugs
Contributor

tgbugs commented May 5, 2016

peripheral nervous system seems to have some bad RELATED synonyms

synonym: "lateral part of the basal amygdalar nucleus" RELATED [NeuroNames:247]
synonym: "lateral part of the basolateral nucleus" RELATED [NeuroNames:247]
synonym: "nucleus amygdalae basalis, pars lateralis" RELATED LATIN [NeuroNames:247]
synonym: "nucleus amygdaloideus basalis, pars lateralis magnocellularis" RELATED LATIN [NeuroNames:247]
synonym: "nucleus basalis lateralis amygdalae" RELATED LATIN [NeuroNames:247]

These appear (correctly) under UBERON:0002888 (lateral part of basal amygdaloid nucleus). Not sure how they are getting pulled in, but they probably shouldn't be there.

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmungall

cmungall May 5, 2016

Member

Good catch. The root of the issue is here http://neurolex.org/wiki/Birnlex_1111#tab=Factbox (follow the neuronames link) - we took the NIFGA to NN xrefs as a trusted source, should be verified.

Member

cmungall commented May 5, 2016

Good catch. The root of the issue is here http://neurolex.org/wiki/Birnlex_1111#tab=Factbox (follow the neuronames link) - we took the NIFGA to NN xrefs as a trusted source, should be verified.

@tgbugs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tgbugs

tgbugs May 5, 2016

Contributor

Looks like that was just a plain error, the ID should be to 3232.

Can't claim credit for this one since Doug Bowden is the one who caught it.

Contributor

tgbugs commented May 5, 2016

Looks like that was just a plain error, the ID should be to 3232.

Can't claim credit for this one since Doug Bowden is the one who caught it.

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmungall

cmungall May 6, 2016

Member

Say hi to Doug from me. I'm still interested in the OWLization of
neuronames and doing a deeper integration with uberon than we have now.

Member

cmungall commented May 6, 2016

Say hi to Doug from me. I'm still interested in the OWLization of
neuronames and doing a deeper integration with uberon than we have now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment