You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently grid is strictly a boolean, but true could be equivalent to the corresponding ticks, a number could compute new ticks (e.g., for higher density) and an array could contain explicit tick values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…rray of tick values
Other changes:
* The grids are not mixed with the axis ticks any more. Instead, they are created in a g element below the axis, with a .grid className.
* The faceted grids are not generated as interrupted paths, but as groups of lines (making it easier to work with them downstream).
* The code is a few lines longer but (imho) easier to read.
closes#7
…rray of tick values
Other changes:
* The grids are not mixed with the axis ticks any more. Instead, they are created in a g element below the axis, with a .grid className.
* The faceted grids are not generated as interrupted paths, but as groups of lines (making it easier to work with them downstream).
* The code is a few lines longer but (imho) easier to read.
closes#7
Currently grid is strictly a boolean, but true could be equivalent to the corresponding ticks, a number could compute new ticks (e.g., for higher density) and an array could contain explicit tick values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: